Case study · Dermocosmetics

How do Chinese dermatologists actually recommend?

Ninety dermatologist interviews across ten cities, and a sequence that explains why scientific credibility was not converting into recommendations.

ClientLa Roche-Posay
DirectionEurope → China

What they asked

A European active-cosmetic brand with high scientific standing in China wanted to understand how dermatologists form and give recommendations in dermocosmetics — where its influence levers were, where localised competitors had taken ground, and what its hospital strategy should be.

What we did

  • Strategic qualitative research: 90 dermatologist interviews
  • Medical–cosmetic crossover regulation and hospital access pathways
  • Competitive analysis of other dermocosmetic brands
  • Digital footprint and academic engagement audit

How it ran

  1. Design the sample around the decision

    Sixty interviews in tier-one cities and thirty in tier-two and lower, face-to-face and on WeChat, with dermatologists from Class III hospitals across a spread of seniority. Four focus areas: sampling behaviour, academic visibility, digital learning, and the public-hospital entry route.

  2. Find the trust mechanism

    The finding was consistent and inconvenient: doctors must use a product before they recommend it, and access to samples inside public hospitals is limited. The sample is not a promotional item in this category — it is the trust mechanism.

  3. Read the competitor correctly

    Local brands were not winning on media weight. They were winning through professor-endorsed consensus papers and visible hospital presence — an academic strategy, run patiently.

  4. Watch how doctors actually learn

    Medical visits work when they are short, data-driven and sample-supported; cold calls do not. Continuing education runs through professional platforms and WeChat, and what earns attention there is clinical data, not lifestyle content.

Outcome

  • A documented recommendation pathway: clinical collaboration → doctor experience → patient trial → recommendation.
  • A clear read of where scientific credibility was failing to convert, and why.
  • A hospital engagement strategy built on sample accessibility and data-based digital education.
  • A competitive picture that named the mechanism, not just the market share.

What it taught us

A brand can hold the highest scientific credibility in its category and still lose ground, if the people who convert that credibility into a recommendation have never used the product.